2026 Mazda CX-50 vs 2026 Subaru Outback – Specs & Capability Showdown

Specs & Size Comparison

Choosing the right crossover can feel like picking the perfect travel partner for the next few years. In this comparison of Mazda CX 50 vs Subaru Outback, we break down design, performance, and everyday usability to help you look ahead with confidence. From driving feel to technology, this Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Outback guide sets the stage before diving into detailed Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Outback specs that really matter.

COMPACT
2026 Mazda CX-50

2026 Mazda CX-50

CX-50 2.5 S Select AWD

187 @ 6000 | 185 @ 4000

FULL-SIZE
2026 Subaru Outback

2026 Subaru Outback

Outback Premium AWD

180 @ 5800 | 178 @ 4400

Popular Features

Bluetooth
standard
standard
Keyless Entry
standard
standard
Keyless Start
standard
standard
Adaptive Cruise Control
standard
standard
Autooff Headlights
standard
standard
Steering Wheel Controls
standard
standard
Adjustable Steering Wheel
standard
standard
Power Door Locks
standard
standard
Power Mirrors
standard
standard
Price
$31,395
$36,445
Cd Expert Rating
9.5
8.5
Cd Awards
Rank In Segment
2, 3941a03c-34a9-4e31-b167-424105f5e354, Best Compact SUVs, /rankings/best-suvs/compact
9, 620c2f69-0fc9-4796-acec-d7eb68a6f494, Best Mid-Size 2-Row SUVs, /rankings/best-suvs/2-row/mid-size
Combined Fuel Economy Epa Est Mpge
/ N/A / N/A
/ N/A / N/A
Fuel Economy Epa Est Mpg
26 (Est) / 24 (Est) / 30 (Est)
27 / 25 / 31
Epa Est Battery Range
N/A
N/A
Seating Capacity
5
5
Maximum Towing Capacity
2000
2700
Basic Warranty
3 / 36,000
3 / 36,000
Front Leg Room
41.7
43
Blind Spot Monitor
standard
standard
Front Collision Mitigation
standard
standard
Lane Departure Warning
standard
standard
Heated Seats
-
standard
Fog Lamps
-
standard
Rear Collision Mitigation
-
standard

Fuel Economy & Range

Combined Fuel Economy Epa Est Mpge
/ N/A / N/A
/ N/A / N/A
Fuel Economy Epa Est Mpg
26 (Est) / 24 (Est) / 30 (Est)
27 / 25 / 31
Fuel Capacity
15.9
18

Warranty

Basic Warranty
3 / 36,000
3 / 36,000
Roadside Assistance
3 / 36,000
3 / 36,000
Drivetrain
5 / 60,000
5 / 60,000
Corrosion
5 / Unlimited
5 / Unlimited

Interior & Storage Space

Seating Capacity
5
5
Front Leg Room
41.7
43
Front Head Room
39.1
41
Front Hip Room
53.6
55
Front Shoulder Room
55.9
57.9
Second Leg Room
39.8
39.5
Second Head Room
38.6
40.5
Second Hip Room
52.1
55.1
Second Shoulder Room
53.6
57.4
Passenger Volume
100.3
112.3
Cargo Volume Behind Second Row
31.4
34.6

Specifications

Price
$31,395
$36,445
Maximum Towing Capacity
2000
2700
Horsepower
187 @ 6000
180 @ 5800
Torque
185 @ 4000
178 @ 4400
Steering Type
Rack-Pinion
Rack-Pinion
Rear Suspension
Torsion Beam
Double Wishbone
Front Suspension
Strut
Strut
Engine Displacement
2.5 L/152
2.5 L/152
Turning Diameter
36
36.5
Width Without Mirrors
75.6
74
Backup Camera
standard
standard
Rear Floor Mats
standard
standard
Power Steering
standard
standard
Upholstery
standard
standard
Cd Expert Rating
9.5
8.5
Cd Awards
Rank In Segment
2, 3941a03c-34a9-4e31-b167-424105f5e354, Best Compact SUVs, /rankings/best-suvs/compact
9, 620c2f69-0fc9-4796-acec-d7eb68a6f494, Best Mid-Size 2-Row SUVs, /rankings/best-suvs/2-row/mid-size
Rear Parking Aid
-
standard

Safety Ratings & Features

Blind Spot Monitor
standard
standard
Front Collision Mitigation
standard
standard
Lane Departure Warning
standard
standard
Rear Collision Mitigation
-
standard

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Volume Behind First Row
56.3
80.5
Cargo Area Height
30.2
31.5
Bed Width Between Wheel Wells
-
43.3

Exterior Dimensions

Length
185.8
191.7
Height
63.5
67.5
Wheelbase
110.8
108.1
Minimum Ground Clearance
8.3
-
Track Width Front
-
62.4
Track Width Rear
-
63.4

Tires & Wheels

Front Tire Size
P225/65HR17
P225/60HR18
Front Wheel Size
17 X 7
18 X 7
Rear Tire Size
P225/65HR17
P225/60HR18
Rear Wheel Size
17 X 7
18 X 7
Spare Tire Size
Compact
Compact
Front Wheel Material
Aluminum
Aluminum
Rear Wheel Material
Aluminum
Aluminum

Brakes

Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc
4-Wheel Disc

When shoppers start searching for the perfect adventure-ready crossover, the Mazda CX 50 vs Subaru Outback debate quickly comes up. Both models are designed for drivers who want comfort during the week and freedom on the weekend—but they take slightly different roads to get there.

In a direct Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Outback comparison, Mazda leans into sporty styling and a refined interior, while Subaru focuses on practicality and its legendary standard all-wheel drive. The CX-50 feels confident and sharp on paved roads, offering a more dynamic driving experience. The Outback, meanwhile, is a long-time favorite for road trips and light off-road use, thanks to its generous ground clearance and reputation for durability.

Looking at the details, Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Outback specs reveal meaningful differences. The Mazda CX-50 offers turbocharged engine options and a sleek cabin design aimed at drivers who value performance and modern tech. The Subaru Outback counters with strong safety features, excellent visibility, and efficient fuel economy—perfect for long journeys into the future.

Ultimately, choosing between these two comes down to lifestyle. Want a sportier feel with upscale design? The CX-50 has your name on it. Prefer a proven, versatile companion for years of adventures ahead? The Outback won’t disappoint. Either way, the road ahead looks exciting.

Back to top button